🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor is likely the ideal choice for a daring scary movie centered on the biblical figure, but not for the reasons certain fans may think. Truthfully, the star doesn't even portray the central religious figure in the new film: his role is credited merely as a craftsman. He is cast as a father figure in this story, striving to uphold his beliefs as his son (acted by Noah Jupe), his now-teenage foster child, starts to display supernatural abilities. The reason it’s difficult to envision a different major actor playing this part is that while the role grows weighed down with multiple challenges, the actor seems practically touchingly confident that the murky, somber small film is worth his time.

The Actor's Current Career Choices

Cage has been using that time more judiciously recently. He continues to makes more films than most regular audiences will ever see — as an illustration, are you aware that the man has completed several distinct cowboy movies over the last few years? — yet he also adds high-profile independent films like one recent hit, another notable movie, and a further title. This new film appears to be one of those, in that it’s borderline horror, likely to stir debate, and handles a campy-sounding premise in a earnest manner.

The Film's Storyline and Execution

Regrettably, writer-director the director fails to repay viewer engagement. The film begins with a engagingly rootless context, marketed as drawing from an apocryphal lost gospel about Christ’s childhood. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their child travel frequently, afraid of doctrinal intolerance or doubt regarding their son's unusual abilities. “Disaster trails us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. It goes on when sinister entities target the family where they currently live, beginning on that traditional religious challenge for the son.

Sometimes, the movie echoes an Exorcist-style horror film, though not one of the main figures are clearly inhabited. On the contrary, they grow progressively isolated mutually, when these powers influence a local young woman (the actress, named an outsider) that the son connects to, and provides everyone disturbing images of a bleak destiny. Cage's role notably fights with his position within the plot, at times berating the boy he can’t fully understand.

Controversy and Caution

The content is prone to court controversy, and Nathan approaches it with a lot of delicacy — too much, perhaps. The concept of a teenage boy dealing with his eventual sacrifice and tempted by dark influences is truly terrifying, but Nathan could be wary of appearing sensational and eager to signal his goals, therefore he regularly withdraws to darkly ominous visuals. Characters brood incessantly — the singer-actress, who displayed real promise in the 2024 Crow remake, surprisingly — cedes her acting to her religious attire, sometimes broken up by several gruesome scary visuals.

Cage's Performance and Film's Flaws

Simultaneously, Cage flirts with exactly the kind of exaggerated performance that his more snickering appreciators might be looking for. There is a moment (shown) in previews where he loses control and screams “My belief is broken!” Should such of dramatic explosion is a component of your Jesus-themed horror movie, possibly a more boldly ridiculous style would be more effective of the actor's readiness to go over the top when necessary. Instead, the film is closer to the poorer low-budget productions the actor filmed over the 2010s — not the cheesy thrillers so much as the dramas and supernatural thrillers that typically appear interesting, and often contain several notable Cage moments, but ultimately feel like, frankly, cheap home video fare.

Frankly, several of these, although simpler, were more watchable in general. This is when I must break my usual practice, not faith-based but professional: Long ago, a respected mentor convinced me to banish descriptive terms like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my film-criticism vocabulary. Such terms convey little except a subjective and broadly stated restlessness, withdrawing from the job of vividly conveying the mental and emotional experience of watching a specific film. It’s difficult to express monotony without seeming uninteresting yourself. It's equally vague as terming a movie “engaging.” “Say more,” that is.

Yet, I acknowledge, I felt uninterested during much of the film. On the positive side, it’s a devotional type of dullness, not because The Carpenter’s Son is lecturing, but as it demands a kind of obedient endurance to sit through it. At some point early on, the film enters a repetitive rhythm of simmering distress, and never really